WHEN COMFORT WITHOUT ACTION BECOMES COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.

   Continuous words of comfort, motivation, inspiration, and encouragement to people in need, without serious plans or discussions about how to practically address their needs, can sometimes produce results contrary to what was intended. Proverbs 13:12 [12]Hope deferred makes the heart sick,     but a longing fulfilled is a tree of life. 

 Words can give people hope, but hope alone does not put food on the table, provide shelter, create employment, pay school fees, restore a broken family, or rebuild a struggling community. When encouragement is repeatedly offered without a practical pathway toward improvement, people eventually get tired of hearing comforting words while their circumstances remain unchanged. This is the mistake many religious leaders, preachers and pastors are making, especially in Africa. 

It is the mistake many politicians are making, mostly in Africa and especially every elections time. 

 In some situations, this can even create a false sense that something is being done when, in reality, very little is changing. The person offering encouragement may feel helpful, but the life conditions of the person receiving it continues to face the same problems. 

 This does not mean that comfort, motivation, prayer, or encouragement are unnecessary. They are important, particularly when people are discouraged or overwhelmed. However, encouragement should ideally become a bridge to action rather than a substitute for action.

 The Bible captures this principle clearly: “If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food... and one of you say unto them, Depart in peace... notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?” — James 2:15–16.

 Psychologically, encouragement can strengthen hope, resilience, and motivation, but lasting improvement is possible when encouragement is connected to practical goals, achievable steps, and real support.

 From a human-rights perspective, people in need should not be viewed merely as recipients of sympathy and words of comfort. They are persons with dignity, rights, abilities, and a legitimate claim to opportunities and conditions that enable them to live and develop with dignity. 

 When someone is genuinely in need, we should ask practical questions: What exactly is the problem? What can be done immediately? What resources are available? Who can help? What skills can be developed? What opportunities can be created? What can the person do for themselves, and what support is genuinely necessary from others? How is the government and other society institutions contributing to this and what can be done?

 Real compassion therefore goes beyond saying, “Be strong,” “Things will get better,” or “Keep believing.” It also asks, “What can we do together to make things better?”

 The goal should not be to make people feel better about their circumstances, but to help them move toward circumstances that are actually better. 

 Comfort the discouraged, encourage the hopeful, but also help the needy find a practical way forward. Words should inspire action, and compassion should ultimately seek results. 

 While after prayer and doing all that is humanly possible, the needy person or community must leave it to God, the believers and indeed the whole society, including governments, must know that God wants them to get ready to respond to the needs of other people, whose needs if met will give glory to God. 

Elijah Mutua Kirima. 

Pastor and Social Worker. 

THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.

PRAYING AND BELIEVING IN THE NAME OF JESUS.

 Saying, “I pray this in the name of Jesus Christ,” or “I believe in Jesus, so things will work,” should not be treated as a formula that guarantees the outcome we desire. 

 To pray in the name of Jesus means trusting him, recognizing his authority, and seeking what agrees with the Word and will of God.

 Likewise, genuine faith in Jesus is more than believing that he exists or simply mentioning his name. True faith should influence how we think, speak, decide, and act. Jesus said: “If ye love me, keep my commandments.” — John 14:15 And: “Why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?” — Luke 6:46 James adds: “Faith without works is dead.” — James 2:26

 Therefore, “in Jesus’ name” should mean more than words at the end of a prayer. It should mean that what we ask and do is consistent with Jesus’ character, teachings, and the will of God. Our confidence should therefore not be: “I mentioned Jesus’ name, so things must work.” 

 Rather: “I have prayed, I trust God, and I am seeking to live and act according to His Word. I can therefore leave the outcome in His hands.” 

 We should also remember that answers may sometimes be delayed because the situation involves the choices and actions of other people. We may pray for others to act with love, kindness, justice, and compassion, but they still have the responsibility to choose obedience.  

True faith is not merely speaking the name of Jesus. It is trusting him, obeying him, and living consistently with what we believe.

 Elijah Mutua Kirima.

Pastor.

 THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.

 This generation’s understanding of democracy is essentially government of the people, by the people, and for the common good—a system in which ordinary citizens have a meaningful voice in determining how they are governed and how their common resources are used. 

 Modern democracy embraces this ideal in principle, but often fails to implement it in practice. 

 For example, people living in slums should have meaningful opportunities to choose leaders who understand their circumstances; villagers should be able to choose leaders who understand their communities; small and large businesses should have representative structures through which their interests can be heard; and professionals should have a meaningful voice in matters affecting their fields. Such communities should not merely be mobilized to vote every few years. They should be empowered to understand the resources available to them, participate in deciding how those resources are used, and hold their representatives accountable. The objective should be simple: help people become productive enough to improve their own lives and increasingly contribute to the public good. 

   If people initially consume more public resources than they contribute because of poverty, that should not become a permanent condition. With education, opportunity, infrastructure, security, markets, and productive investment, people can become more self-reliant and greater contributors to society. 

    Yet this creates a difficult challenge for political leadership. Where poverty is widespread, governments may spend enormous resources meeting immediate needs. If leaders enter office expecting personal enrichment and discover that public resources cannot satisfy both public needs and private ambitions, some may seek ways to capture those resources for themselves. 

   This is where democracy can begin to resemble the very systems it claims to have replaced. 

 WHO REALLY FOUGHT FOR DEMOCRACY?

 History deserves careful examination. Many movements that challenged monarchies and demanded constitutional or representative government were led by people who were employed by monarchs, educated elites, political reformers, merchants, professionals, landowners, and others seeking greater political and economic influence. In most struggles, the conflict was not simply monarch versus ordinary citizen, but monarch versus other powerful groups seeking a greater share of political authority and economic opportunity. Those groups, too, may not have cared deeply about ordinary citizens. It should always be remembered that: Changing the people occupying the throne—or changing the name of the political system—does not automatically change the character of political power. If those who replace a monarch acquire the same unchecked appetite for wealth, privilege, influence, and control, people may experience a change of rulers without experiencing a genuine change of government. The problem, therefore, is not merely who rules. The deeper questions are: How is power structured? Who can exercise it? Who can restrain it? And whose interests does it ultimately serve? >

 DEMOCRACY CAN REPRODUCE THE FAILURES OF MONARCHY

 1. PERSONAL INTEREST.

     A monarch may place personal interests above the welfare of the people. A democratic leader can do exactly the same—except that the democratic leader may do so while claiming to represent the people. ;

2. PUBLIC RESOURCES.

 ;    A monarch may spend public resources on palaces, luxury, extravagant ceremonies, or personal interests while citizens struggle for food, education, healthcare, and housing. A democratic government can similarly misuse public resources through corruption, waste, excessive privileges, or projects designed mainly to benefit politically connected individuals. The title of the ruler does not determine the morality of the ruler. 

3. UNFAIR LAWS.

  A monarch may create or preserve laws protecting the ruler’s power, property, and privileges. A democratic system can also produce laws that disproportionately benefit those who already possess wealth, influence, or political connections. Where financial power determines political access, democracy can gradually become government by those who can afford influence. 

 4. SELFISH WARS.

    Kings and emperors have historically entered wars for territory, prestige, wealth, strategic advantage, or personal glory, while ordinary citizens paid the price in blood. Democratic governments are not automatically immune. Military action may be justified in the name of national interest while political, strategic, ideological, or economic interests also influence the decision. Where natural resources, territory, contracts, strategic influence, or other benefits are involved, citizens deserve honest answers. No leader should have the right to sacrifice ordinary people merely to advance personal ambition or enrich a connected few. 

 5. FAVORITISM. 

 ;  A monarch may give positions, wealth, and privileges to relatives and friends regardless of competence. Democratic governments can do the same through nepotism, patronage, political appointments, and preferential access to public resources. A ballot box does not automatically eliminate favoritism. 

 6. IGNORING THE PUBLIC.

     A ruler may ignore citizens suffering from hunger, disease, unemployment, insecurity, or economic hardship. Democratic leaders can also become disconnected from the people once they acquire power. A government that listens to citizens only during elections has reduced democracy to a periodic ceremony rather than a continuing relationship of service delivery between citizens and their representatives.

 7. NO ABSOLUTE POWER.

    True democracy must prevent any individual or small group from acquiring absolute, unchecked power over others. Institutions must be strong enough to restrain leaders. Courts must be independent. Legislatures must provide genuine oversight. Public finances must be transparent. Elections must be credible. The media and civil society must be free to question government. Citizens must be able to disagree without becoming enemies of the state. 

 WHAT THIS GENERATION SHOULD DEMAND. ;

   If democracy is genuinely about the people, ordinary citizens must become more than voters. ;

 1. A SHARED AND EQUAL VOICE. 

   People should have a meaningful voice in governing their communities and determining how public resources are used. Poverty should not be treated as evidence that people are incapable of governing themselves. Rather, it should be a reason to empower them. A poor community may initially consume more public resources than it contributes. But with education, infrastructure, opportunity, security, markets, and productive investment, it can become increasingly self-sustaining and eventually contribute far more to the common treasury. ;

 2. SELF-RULE AND REPRESENTATION.     People living under similar circumstances should have meaningful ways to organize, express their interests, choose representatives, and participate in decisions affecting their lives. Citizens should also have continuing mechanisms for communicating with, questioning, evaluating, and, where necessary, replacing those who represent them. 

 3. INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM.

     Every person should enjoy fundamental freedoms and equal protection under the law. Leadership should not mean that the majority may oppress the minority, nor that government may violate individual rights.>

 4. COLLECTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY. 

   Citizens must hold leaders accountable, and everyone in society must understand that they are accountable for their actions. Public office must never become a private business opportunity. Public money must never be treated as personal money. Political power must never become a license for personal enrichment. </div>

 5. EQUAL PARTICIPATION. v>

   True democracy should ensure that laws and leadership reflect the legitimate interests and will of citizens across different social and economic circumstances—not merely those of privileged political, economic, or professional classes. The wealthy do not have greater human value than the poor. The powerful should not have greater rights than the powerless. ;

 6. AN INFORMED CITIZENRY. 

<div>   Democracy requires citizens who are willing to learn, question, debate, participate, and take responsibility for their communities. A population that votes but does not examine or is not allowed to examine what its leaders do can easily be manipulated. Democracy therefore requires not only the freedom to vote, but also the capacity and freedom to think.

 THE REAL ISSUE IS NOT THE LABEL.     Ultimately, citizens should not be obsessed with whether their system is called a monarchy, democracy, republic, or something else. The more important questions are: Does the system genuinely protect and advance the highest legitimate interests of the people? Do citizens have dignity and respect? Are their lives protected? Do they have meaningful representation? Can they speak freely? Can they work and prosper? Can they hold leaders accountable? Can they replace leaders peacefully? Are public resources used for the public good? Does the system create genuine opportunities for ordinary people to improve their lives? These questions matter more than political labels. A government may call itself democratic while behaving like an oligarchy. It may hold elections while concentrating power in the hands of a privileged few. It may constantly speak about “the people” while treating citizens merely as instruments for obtaining political power. And a monarchy may, in some circumstances, decide to do everything right. Therefore, government must be judged by its fruits, not merely by its name. iv>

 FROM PROTECTING LEADERS TO PROTECTING THE SYSTEM. 

Perhaps one of the greatest tests of a political system is the role of its police and military. Their ultimate responsibility should not be to protect an individual leader’s position at all costs. Their responsibility should be to protect the constitutional order, the people, the nation, and the lawful institutions through which citizens govern themselves. If an officeholder fails to act according to the demands of that office, lawful institutions, citizens and civil society and officials must be able to question that conduct and hold the person accountable without intimidation or improper interference. A leader should not become more important than the people. A political party should not become more important than the nation. A government should not become more important than the constitution and the law. And the state should never become the private possession of those temporarily entrusted with its leadership. The police and military should therefore protect a responsive, lawful system—not the personal interests of whoever happens to hold office. 

 THE FINAL QUESTION. 

   The question before this generation is not simply: “Do we have democracy?” It is:

<div>

 “Does our democracy actually belong to the people?” ;

    If citizens remain poor, powerless, unheard, unrepresented, and unable to hold leaders accountable while a small political class continually enriches itself through public power, then changing the name of the system accomplishes very little. 

 A democracy that serves only the powerful has betrayed its own promise. And when leaders who claim to serve the people instead exploit, deceive, manipulate, divide, and devour the very people who entrusted them with power, we must ask whether a monarch might, with time, have done better. 

The true measure of government is not the title of its senior-most leader. (Like we managed to have a President and not a monarch). It is whether the people at the bottom can rise. 

 It is whether every citizen has dignity, freedom, representation, opportunity, justice, and a genuine chance to prosper. That is the democracy worth defending.

 Romans 2:21a You, then, who teach others, do you not teach yourself? The secret for a better life for all is no longer a secret: Want for others the same that you want for yourself and yours. </div>

 Elijah Mutua Kirima. 

Social Worker ( BASW UON). 

THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.

NEED FOR LEGAL REVIEW BEFORE WAR IS ORDERED. Because millions pray for peace daily.

One of the greatest weaknesses in today's international system is that legal review often comes after war has already begun—when lives have already been lost, communities destroyed, and enormous resources wasted. Justice is frequently asked to examine a conflict only after the damage has been done. 

 A stronger commitment to the rule of law would encourage legal scrutiny before offensive military action is launched, whenever circumstances reasonably allow. Just as major decisions affecting individuals and organizations are subject to legal oversight, decisions that could cost thousands—or even millions—of lives should also receive timely legal examination. 

 Early Judicial Review.

Where time and circumstances permit, courts or other competent judicial bodies should be empowered to examine the legality of a proposed offensive military operation before it begins. An independent legal determination would provide an objective foundation for governments, military commanders, and service members. 

 Even when a nation believes it faces a serious security threat, military legal advisers—who already participate in intelligence and operational planning—should rapidly assess both the legal basis for military action and the domestic and international laws that could be affected by it. Their professional advice may justify delaying or reconsidering military action until its legality has been properly clarified. 

Access to Justice During Armed Conflict.

 National laws and international agreements could establish procedures allowing the legality of a proposed war—or a war already underway—to be challenged before appropriate judicial bodies. Depending on jurisdiction, these may include national courts, regional courts, continental courts, or international judicial institutions. Where legally permissible, similar proceedings could even take place simultaneously before different courts. 

 If a court determines that there is insufficient legal justification for military action, particularly where the opposing state has not launched or is not continuing an armed attack, every reasonable opportunity should first be given to diplomacy, dialogue, mediation, arbitration, and other peaceful means of resolving the dispute.

 For these legal safeguards to be effective, such cases should be handled through simple, fast, affordable, and accessible procedures, especially where urgent decisions involving human life are required. 

 Legal Certainty for Military Personnel

 Independent judicial review would also benefit military personnel by providing greater certainty about the legality of military operations. Clear legal guidance would help commanders and soldiers understand their responsibilities under both domestic and international law, reducing uncertainty when faced with difficult decisions.

 At present, the United Nations provides no direct physical, legal, or institutional protection for individual soldiers—or even for an entire national military—that refuses orders from its constitutional commander-in-chief solely because it believes a military strike lacks sufficient legal justification. Such matters are generally treated as internal constitutional, military, or disciplinary issues. However, international law—including principles developed after the Nuremberg Trials—recognizes that military personnel may have a duty to refuse manifestly unlawful orders, such as orders to commit genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, or other serious violations of international law. The application of these principles to decisions about whether a war itself is lawful, however, often remains legally complex and disputed. Earlier judicial review could therefore provide governments, military leaders, and service members with much-needed legal certainty before military operations begin. 

 Court decisions could also strengthen the legal position of soldiers who act in good faith by relying on authoritative judicial rulings, reducing the possibility that they are left solely subject to domestic punishment without meaningful legal protection.

 Possible Reforms.

  1. Early Judicial Review of Proposed Wars.

  Before launching offensive military action—except where immediate self-defense requires urgent action—states could seek an independent judicial determination on whether the proposed use of force complies with domestic and international law.

 National, regional, or international courts could establish expedited procedures for urgent cases. Where states agree, these decisions could be advisory or legally binding. 

 If a court concludes that a proposed military operation is unlawful, military personnel would have a much clearer legal basis for questioning or refusing participation, consistent with applicable law. 

2. A United Nations Legal Assessment Panel.

  The United Nations could establish an independent panel of respected international legal experts to conduct rapid assessments of whether proposed military operations appear consistent with the UN Charter and international law.

 Although such opinions might not always be legally binding, they could provide highly authoritative legal guidance to governments, courts, military commanders, and the international community. 

 3. Protection for Good-Faith Refusal. 

Member States could negotiate an international treaty providing appropriate legal protection for military personnel who refuse to participate in military operations that have been determined by a competent judicial or international body to constitute unlawful aggression or other serious violations of international law. 

 4. Emergency United Nations Security Council.

Review Before major offensive military operations begin, any concerned state could request an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Although Security Council decisions may be influenced by the veto power of permanent members, an official legal and political debate would still provide valuable international guidance regarding the legitimacy of the proposed military action. 

 5. Post-Conflict Legal Remedies.

  Where a competent international tribunal later determines that a war was unlawful, military personnel who refused participation in good faith could be eligible for legal protection, review of domestic convictions, and other appropriate remedies consistent with applicable law. 

 6. Clearer International Standards The United Nations, together with its Member States, could develop clearer international guidelines explaining when military personnel have not only the right—but, in appropriate circumstances, the legal duty—to question or refuse orders requiring participation in internationally unlawful conduct. 

 Conclusion.

  The purpose of these proposals is not to prevent nations from defending themselves against genuine armed attack. Every state has the right to protect its people when faced with real aggression.

 Rather, these reforms seek to strengthen the rule of law by ensuring that decisions to wage offensive war receive timely legal scrutiny whenever practicable. Earlier legal review could help prevent unlawful conflicts, promote peaceful settlement of disputes, provide greater legal certainty for governments and armed forces, and reinforce the principles of justice embodied in the Charter of the United Nations and international law. 

 War should never become easier to begin than justice is to obtain. Whenever possible, the law should speak before the weapons do. 

 Elijah Mutua Kirima.

  Social Worker.

  THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD

THE POWER OF YOUR SOFTWARE - BELIEF.

THE POWER OF YOUR SOFTWARE – BELIEF 

Software is a set of digital instructions or programs that tell a computer or phone what to do. 

In much the same way, belief functions like the software of the human mind. It powerfully shapes our thinking, character, decisions, attitudes, behavior, and actions. 

 The statement of THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD organization expresses this truth well: "We hold that what you believe will affect everything else you do."

 The Apostle Paul also highlights the power of belief in Romans 10:17: 

 "Consequently, faith comes from hearing the message, and the message is heard through the word about Christ."

 The same principle applies more broadly:

 people generally come to believe what they have first been exposed to and gradually develop confidence in it over time.

 How People Form Their Beliefs:

-  Childhood exposure: 

Family, culture, and early teaching shape many of our foundational beliefs. 

-  Personal experience:

 What we see, hear, touch, and experience for ourselves often influences our conclusions. 

-  Authority and experts: 

Teachers, leaders, books, and scientists influence what people accept as true.

-  Social groups:

 Friends, communities, and society reinforce beliefs, values, and norms that we often adopt. 

-  Intuition: 

Some ideas simply feel right or natural, even without careful examination.

-  Reason and logic:

 People also arrive at beliefs by evaluating facts and reasoning through evidence. 

 Why People Hold On to Their Beliefs:

-  Confirmation bias: 

People naturally look for evidence that supports what they already believe while overlooking evidence that challenges it.

-  Habit:

 Beliefs held for a long time become familiar and difficult to change. 

- Comfort and meaning: Some beliefs provide security, hope, purpose, or a sense of identity, making them emotionally difficult to abandon.

 The Power of Belief in Everyday Life:

  Beliefs profoundly influence how people live:

- Some believe God will heal them and therefore never seek medical attention.

- Some believe the Holy Spirit is their teacher and therefore see no need for formal education. 

- Some believe God will provide for all their needs and therefore make no effort to work or earn a living. 

-  Some believe suffering is necessary and therefore subject others to circumstances that unnecessarily increase their suffering. 

- Some have the ability to help those in need but refuse to do so because they believe God alone should intervene directly, or that hardship is always God's way of teaching a person a lesson. 

-  Some believe they are God's agents to punish evildoers, and when individuals or governments act on this belief without due regard for justice and the rule of law, the consequences can become dangerous. 

 These examples demonstrate that beliefs are never merely private opinions. They shape actions, influence relationships, affect institutions, and ultimately impact entire societies. 

 The Perfect Belief:

  The Bible concludes by offering every person the highest belief to embrace: 

To love God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and to love your neighbour as yourself. 

Such love seeks the highest good of both oneself and others. It refuses to do actual or intended harm and instead promotes truth, justice, mercy, compassion, and human flourishing. 

 When this belief becomes the "software" that governs a person's life, it transforms not only the individual but also families, communities, and nations. 

 Elijah Mutua Kirima.

 Pastor.

 THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.

AUDITING MANKIND'S DELEGATED AUTHORITY.

AUDITING MANKIND'S DELEGATED AUTHORITY TO RULE 

 In Genesis, God gave mankind delegated authority to rule over His creation. Significantly, the passage does not explicitly give one human being authority to rule over another. Rather, humanity was entrusted with the responsibility of exercising dominion over the earth as God's representative. People may naturally guide others according to their wisdom, expertise, or ability, and throughout history various forms of human government have emerged with the expectation that leadership should serve the common good. 

 Genesis 1:26

 "Then God said, 'Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.'" 

 This raises an important question: 

 Has humanity exercised this delegated authority faithfully?

 Many aspects of history suggest that we have often fallen short. 

 Human beings have benefited enormously from animals. They have provided food, clothing, transport, labour, companionship, medicine, and have contributed greatly to scientific research. Yet how have we treated them in return? 

 One observation that has often crossed my mind concerns the diets of many domestic animals. Some would argue that their food is simply part of God's created design. Yet one may still ask whether, over time, human beings have taken the best for themselves while leaving animals to survive largely on what people discard or no longer desire.

 Another ethical question follows. After receiving so many benefits from animals, is it right to slaughter them for food? Scripture permits the eating of animals, yet it also teaches that the righteous care for the welfare of their animals. This should lead us to consider not only what is permissible, but also whether we exercise dominion with gratitude, compassion, and responsibility.

 A related question also deserves reflection. Why do human beings become deeply angered when a wild animal kills a person, yet often feel little or no moral discomfort when they slaughter animals for meat? Whether or not one agrees with the comparison, it invites us to examine whether we expect mercy from nature while extending very little mercy ourselves. 

 The many conservation efforts around the world also raise important questions. Are they motivated primarily by genuine concern for the welfare of wildlife, by the desire to preserve ecosystems, by the benefits people derive from them, or by a combination of these motives? Whatever the answer, true stewardship should value creation because it belongs to God.

 Humanity's failure is not limited to its treatment of animals. 

 When dealing with fellow human beings, history records slavery, colonialism, exploitation, discrimination, forced labour, oppression, and countless other abuses of power. 

 For example, history records instances in which some colonial settlers preferred sharing meals with their dogs rather than with Africans, revealing the depth of racial prejudice and the denial of human dignity.

 Wars and conflicts continue across the world. In many cases, they begin because one group seeks to dominate, exploit, or oppress another. 

 The rich and powerful have frequently used their influence to enrich themselves at the expense of the weak and the poor. Too often, power has been used not to serve, but to dominate.

 Modern money-based economies have also revealed significant inequalities. In many places, the poor are left consuming lower-quality goods, including highly processed foods, while wealth, quality healthcare, education, and opportunity become increasingly concentrated among those who already possess greater resources. 

 Money itself is morally neutral. Scripture does not condemn money. Rather, it repeatedly warns against greed, oppression, injustice, and the love of money. The deeper problem is not money itself, but sinful human hearts and unjust systems. 

 Another observation concerns the control of natural resources. Water, minerals, fertile land, and other valuable resources are often controlled by powerful individuals, corporations, or nations.

 History—and many present-day realities, especially in Africa—provides numerous examples of regions rich in natural resources remaining impoverished while much of their wealth benefits political elites, multinational interests, or powerful foreign nations. 

 The lesson is clear:

 Power without justice often becomes exploitation. 

 Humanity was entrusted with responsibility. Yet instead of consistently reflecting God's character, people have too often reflected selfishness, violence, greed, pride, corruption, and injustice. 

 HOPE THROUGH RIGHTEOUS RULE

 Although mankind has not exercised its delegated authority faithfully, hope remains. 

As long as this world continues, we can 

choose a better path by loving God sincerely, loving our neighbours genuinely, pursuing justice, showing mercy, and seeking the good of others.

 For Christians, our ultimate hope rests in the coming reign of Jesus Christ. He will redeem what humanity has corrupted and establish perfect justice and righteousness. 

 Acts 17:31 "For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead." Isaiah describes this righteous kingdom: Isaiah 11:3, 6 "...He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or decide by what he hears with his ears..." "The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them." 

 Isaiah 32:1–5 "See, a king will reign in righteousness and rulers will rule with justice." Under His rule, justice will replace oppression, truth will replace deception, and the vulnerable will find refuge. The foolish will no longer be celebrated as wise, nor the corrupt honoured as noble. Humanity's first stewardship has too often been marked by failure. Yet God's final kingdom will demonstrate what righteous dominion was always meant to be—authority exercised with perfect justice, truth, compassion, and love.

 Elijah Mutua Kirima.

 Pastor.

THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD

CAN A TEENAGER OR A YOUTH BE A FRIEND TO AN OLDER PERSON?

Yes. Healthy friendships between younger and older people can be incredibly valuable and enriching for both. Throughout history, families and communities have often benefited when generations learn from and support one another. Benefits for the Youth Gaining Wisdom: Young people can receive valuable life lessons from someone with decades of experience. Historical Perspective: Older friends provide living history through their personal experiences and stories. Emotional Support: Trusted older adults can offer patient, caring, and non-judgmental listening without replacing the role of parents or guardians. Career Guidance: Experienced professionals can share practical advice about education, work, leadership, and personal development. Building Empathy: Spending time with older people helps young people appreciate aging, understand different stages of life, and develop compassion. Benefits for the Older Person Reducing Loneliness: Genuine companionship helps reduce social isolation and supports emotional well-being. Technology Assistance: Younger friends can help older adults learn to use smartphones, computers, and other digital tools. Practical Help: Young people may assist with errands, lifting heavy items, or setting up technology. Staying Engaged: The enthusiasm and fresh perspectives of youth can help older adults remain mentally active and socially connected. A Sense of Purpose: Sharing knowledge, skills, and life experiences allows older adults to contribute meaningfully to the next generation. Mutual Benefits Breaking Stereotypes: Both generations learn to see each other as individuals rather than through common stereotypes. Building Stronger Communities: Intergenerational friendships strengthen families, neighborhoods, workplaces, and communities by increasing trust, understanding, and cooperation. What About Sexual or Romantic Feelings? Human beings can sometimes experience romantic or sexual attraction, even in such friendships. This possibility should never be ignored but should always be handled with maturity, wisdom, responsibility, and respect. When one person is a minor, the relationship must remain entirely appropriate, non-sexual, and within legal, ethical, and family-protective boundaries. Older people have a special responsibility to protect the well-being of children and teenagers and to avoid any conduct that could exploit, manipulate, or confuse them. When both individuals are consenting adults, a friendship may, in some cases, develop into a romantic relationship. If that happens, both people should ensure that their relationship is lawful, respectful, free from coercion, and marked by personal responsibility. In some African cultures, kinship traditions create special social relationships across generations. For example, a child may be named after a grandparent or parent, and family customs may allow affectionate joking, respectful teasing, or other forms of culturally understood interaction. Such traditions are intended to strengthen family bonds and should always be practiced in ways that respect cultural norms, personal dignity, appropriate boundaries, and the law. Healthy intergenerational friendships are built on trust, respect, mutual learning, and genuine care. When clear boundaries, integrity, and responsibility are maintained, they can become a great blessing to both individuals and to society as a whole. SOCIAL WORK ARTICLE ELIJAH MUTUA KIRIMA - SOCIAL WORKER. THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.

TAKE IT TO GOD IN PRAYER DOES NOT MEAN THERE IS NO ACTION OR HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY.

There is no doubt that the Word of God instructs us to make our requests known to Him. Philippians 4:6–7 (NIV) "Do not be anxious about anything, but in every situation, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus." Prayer is our official communication with God. It is like presenting our case before the Headquarters of His Kingdom. When we present a matter to an effective earthly government, the process does not usually end with reporting the problem. Rather, action begins according to the laws and procedures governing that matter. The actual work is then carried out by people, sometimes assisted by technology and other available resources. In a similar way, prayer is not meant to replace action; it often initiates it. God certainly has the power to intervene miraculously whenever He chooses, but throughout Scripture He frequently works through people—including the very person who prayed. When we pray, it is like visiting the office of a wise and resourceful authority. You may receive guidance, instruction, wisdom, a referral, or direction concerning who should handle the matter and what should be done next. Within the boundaries of His written Word, God may lead you to: Take a specific course of action. Seek employment or faithfully perform your work. Ask for or grant forgiveness. Explain your actions where necessary. Seek help from appropriate people. Notify family members, church leaders, government authorities, or trusted friends. Pursue lawful justice through the courts or other legal institutions. Participate in lawful and peaceful efforts to resist evil, promote justice, or call leaders to accountability. In other cases, God may move other people to help you, defend you, provide for you, or stand with you. Therefore, making your requests known to God does not mean that you have no responsibility. Neither does it mean that other people are released from their responsibility to do what is right, administer justice, or stop actions that are causing suffering. Prayer and responsibility work together—not against each other. After praying, we should faithfully do what God places in our hearts to do, while remaining obedient to His Word. If no immediate solution appears, we still do not need to be anxious, because anxiety cannot solve the problem. Instead, we continue trusting God while faithfully carrying out the responsibilities before us. The passage in Philippians also teaches us to approach God with thanksgiving. As we present our needs, we should not become so consumed by our present difficulties that we fail to recognize the many ways God has already blessed us. Count your blessings. Remember His past faithfulness. Thank Him for His grace, His provision, His protection, His forgiveness, and the hope He has given you. Consider someone who reports a problem to an earthly government while continually insulting every official and declaring that nothing good has ever been done. Such bitterness often clouds judgment and damages communication. While government officials should still perform their duties fairly, an angry and bitter person may struggle to listen carefully, understand instructions, or cooperate with the process. Likewise, if we become consumed with bitterness toward God because of our circumstances, our hearts and minds may become less receptive to His guidance. God is never unjust, but bitterness can prevent us from recognizing His direction when He speaks through His Word, His Spirit, wise counsel, or the opportunities He places before us. Prayer brings God's peace, but it also prepares us to walk in faithful obedience. We trust God completely, give thanks continually, and responsibly do what He calls us to do, leaving the results in His hands. Elijah Mutua Kirima. Pastor. THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.

KNOWLEDGE IS KEY—AND IT MUST LEAD TO ACTION.

In every area of life, people are busy doing something. Every human activity is guided by some form of knowledge. Without the right knowledge, our efforts often become ineffective, wasteful, or even harmful. The Bible teaches us about faith in God. God reveals that He has a Kingdom, and that the earth and everyone in it are part of His creation and under His rightful rule. He desires what is best for every individual, every family, every society, and the whole creation. Therefore, He has given us His teachings—His knowledge—to show us how to live in harmony with Him and with one another. 2 Peter 1:2–3 "Grace and peace be yours in abundance through the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord. His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and goodness." This passage teaches that grace, peace, and divine power are experienced through the knowledge of God and of Jesus Christ. Grace is not only God's favor that secures our eternal salvation. It is also the power, strength, and enablement God gives us to live a righteous and fruitful life every single day. Through His grace, God equips us to face life's challenges without surrendering to sin, fear, or despair. Jesus Himself said: John 14:27 "Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid." The Bible does not pretend that life is free from difficulties. On the contrary, it openly acknowledges that living according to God's standards will involve many challenges. Yet God has not left us without direction. He has revealed the knowledge we need to approach every situation wisely. When we put God's knowledge into action, we become better equipped to overcome life's challenges without losing our peace, without doing evil to others, without harming them, and without making difficult situations even worse. God's Word does more than inform us—it transforms us. It provides wisdom for our decisions, guidance for our relationships, strength for our trials, and hope for our future. The totality of God's revealed knowledge is the channel through which His divine power works in our lives. As we continually learn, believe, and obey His Word, He supplies everything we need to live a godly life and to fulfill His purpose in this world. Knowledge, therefore, is not the final goal. It must lead to faith, obedience, righteous action, and transformed living. That is how God's Kingdom is reflected in individuals, families, communities, and nations. Elijah Mutua Kirima Pastor: THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.

WHO TRULY "FEELS" THE POOR IN AFRICA?

WHO TRULY "FEELS" THE POOR IN AFRICA? The poor in Africa have endured hardship before the colonial period, during colonial rule, and even after independence. For generations, they have hoped for a day when their suffering would finally come to an end—or at least be significantly reduced. This raises difficult questions. Were the colonial powers solely responsible for the suffering of the poor, if at all? Or has the failure to uplift the poorest continued under African self-rule? In many cases, important reforms benefiting vulnerable people have come through a combination of internal leadership, citizen advocacy, and encouragement or pressure from international partners. At the same time, many Africans continue to question whether enough has been done by their own leaders to place the welfare of ordinary citizens at the center of national priorities. While many individuals have improved their lives through extraordinary determination and hard work, millions remain trapped in poverty, and in some places their condition has become even more difficult. The poor are often the unseen builders, producers, and sustainers of society. They supervise or construct magnificent homes, office towers, schools, and hospitals, only to return to houses made of wood, iron sheets, cardboard, or plastic. They build roads they may never drive on, assemble cars they may never own, and build airports whose aeroplanes they may never board. They sell phones and laptops they may never own. They tailor expensive suits and elegant dresses for wealthy clients and international markets, while they and their own families wear worn-out clothes. They spend long hours producing food, soap, medicine, and other essential goods that they themselves often cannot afford to buy. They care for the sick in hospitals, yet cannot afford quality healthcare when they or their own families become ill. Security officers spend their days protecting wealthy people and valuable property, while their own families often remain vulnerable. After returning their firearms at the end of a shift, many travel home with no guarantee of their own safety. They work in flower farms producing beautiful flowers for local and international markets, yet cannot afford to buy those same flowers to place on the graves of their own loved ones. Some teach in universities and colleges, yet struggle to educate their own children in those very institutions. A house helper may leave her own child with inadequate care in order to look after the child of a wealthy family, only to receive wages too small to provide adequately for her own household. Farm workers harvest abundant crops throughout the day, yet earn too little to provide sufficient food for their own families. Many are encouraged to give generously in churches to support poor people in distant places, while the poverty within their own communities often goes unnoticed. Some are paid to campaign for and praise the children of the wealthy during elections, while believing that their own sons and daughters are unworthy of leadership. Many thousands more have no employment at all. They depend entirely on a single breadwinner struggling to support an entire household. Communities could greatly benefit from trained community workers and social workers, yet governments often invest far less in these services than the need requires. People should also have a heart to help other people whenever they are able. Yet poverty is not sustained only by external forces. It is also prolonged by internal divisions. Enmity, envy, mistrust, suspicion, hopelessness, and the habit of pretending that "everything is fine" while silently suffering prevent poor communities from working together. These attitudes must come to an end. Honest conversations built on truth, respect, humility, accountability, and trust are essential if communities are to discover lasting solutions. Governments, international governmental organizations, non-governmental organizations, churches, businesses, and civil society should place the restoration of human dignity at the center of their efforts. Assistance should not merely relieve immediate suffering but also strengthen people's ability to build sustainable and independent lives while upholding their human rights. Communities themselves also have an important responsibility. They must unite, listen to men and women of integrity within their own communities who can provide wise guidance, understand their constitutions and laws, know both their rights and responsibilities, and peacefully advocate for justice and equal opportunity. Elected leaders, in turn, have a duty to enact and faithfully enforce laws that protect the vulnerable, promote equal opportunity, fight corruption, encourage productive enterprise, and ensure that the benefits of national development reach every citizen rather than a privileged few. The question, therefore, is not only who talks about the poor, but who truly feels their suffering enough to pursue justice, protect their dignity, create opportunity, and walk alongside them until poverty is no longer their permanent condition. The Bible gives a solemn warning to those who enrich themselves through injustice, greed and selfishness. James condemns those who withheld the wages of their workers while living in luxury and self-indulgence. He warns that such selfishness is not merely an economic failure but a moral one that brings God's judgment. James 5:4–5 NLT 1 Look here, you rich people: Weep and groan with anguish because of all the terrible troubles ahead of you. 2 Your wealth is rotting away, and your fine clothes are moth-eaten rags. 3 Your gold and silver are corroded. The very wealth you were counting on will eat away your flesh like fire. This corroded treasure you have hoarded will testify against you on the day of judgment. 4 For listen! Hear the cries of the field workers whom you have cheated of their pay. The cries of those who harvest your fields have reached the ears of the Lord of Heaven’s Armies. 5 You have spent your years on earth in luxury, satisfying your every desire. You have fattened yourselves for the day of slaughter. 6 You have condemned and killed innocent people,[a] who do not resist you.[b] The passage reminds us that prosperity built on exploiting the poor is ultimately self-destructive. God hears the cries of those who have been treated unjustly, and He calls every generation to pursue justice, mercy, and righteousness. Rev. Elijah Mutua Kirima Social Worker THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD

THE WORST FORM OF CORRUPTION.

THE WORST FORM OF CORRUPTION The worst form of corruption is not merely the exchange of money, gifts, or favors. It is the corruption of truth, justice, and entire institutions. The very institutions established to discover truth, administer justice, and protect individuals, society, and property are instead used to manufacture falsehoods that appear legitimate. it occurs When: A powerful leader influences a group of leaders, officials, or decision-makers to reach a predetermined conclusion, creating the impression that the decision resulted from independent judgment, broad agreement, and careful deliberation. One person invents a false accusation, then recruits, coaches, or pressures others to provide false testimony, making deception appear to be overwhelming evidence. Leaders collude with officials within institutions to alter, destroy, conceal, or fabricate records and documents in order to erase the truth or create false evidence. Influential individuals or leaders manipulate professional investigators, police officers, military personnel, prosecutors, or other security agencies to target particular individuals or groups, making politically or personally motivated actions appear to be impartial, professional investigations. Courts of law are subjected to improper pressure or manipulation so that judicial outcomes are effectively predetermined, while false, distorted, or misleading evidence is presented to give those outcomes an appearance of legitimacy. Why This Form of Corruption Is So Dangerous This form of corruption is especially destructive because it corrupts the very institutions that exist to protect society. When investigators, witnesses, public records, decision-makers, and courts are manipulated, innocent people may be condemned while the guilty escape accountability. The consequences extend far beyond individual victims. Such corruption: Undermines public trust in government and public institutions. Weakens the rule of law. Discourages integrity and honest leadership. Creates fear, injustice, and uncertainty throughout society. Encourages impunity by rewarding those who abuse power. Damages economic development by reducing confidence in public institutions and fair competition. Leaves future generations with weakened institutions that are increasingly difficult to reform. A healthy society depends on leaders and institutions that value truth above personal, political, or financial interests. When truth is sacrificed, justice becomes impossible. Once justice is compromised, corruption spreads throughout the entire system. "He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the just, even they both are abomination to the LORD." — Proverbs 17:15 "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil... Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him!" — Isaiah 5:20–23  NB: Institutional corruption often outlives those who created it. It's a snake that will turn around and bite you in one way or another. That is why there needs to be a stop and protection of the integrity of institutions be encouraged as essential for just societies. REV. ELIJAH MUTUA KIRIMA Social Worker THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD July 29, 2026

BREAKING THE CYCLE OF POVERTY.

BREAKING THE CYCLE OF POVERTY Escaping extreme poverty is rarely easy. It often requires years of sacrifice, discipline, resilience, and wise decision-making. For families born into poverty, breaking the cycle begins with the conviction that their future does not have to be defined by their past. While external support and fair opportunities are essential, the following principles can help families build a better future. Acknowledge the reality. Parents and children should honestly recognize the situation they are in and make a shared commitment to break the cycle of poverty. Develop strong character and resilience. Integrity, self-discipline, responsibility, patience, and perseverance enable families to overcome setbacks without creating even greater problems. Value education. Children should embrace every opportunity to attend school and study with discipline, commitment, and dedication. Education remains one of the most powerful pathways out of poverty. Earn an honest living. Avoid illegal, dishonest, or exploitative ways of making money. Wealth gained through crime or corruption often brings greater suffering and destroys future opportunities. Endure criticism and discouragement. Some people may ridicule, reject, or underestimate those from poor backgrounds. Do not allow their opinions to determine your future. Celebrate every achievement. Appreciate small victories, encourage one another, and keep hope alive. Lasting progress is often made one step at a time. Take advantage of available support. Make good use of opportunities provided by governments, schools, community organizations, faith-based organizations, charities, employers, and development partners. Stay away from alcohol and drug abuse. Addiction destroys health, finances, relationships, productivity, and opportunities that are essential for escaping poverty. Protect your reputation. Although it is unfair, some people wrongly associate poverty with poor character and crime. Do not give them reasons to reinforce that stereotype. Let honesty, respect, reliability, and good conduct speak for you. Work diligently and build positive relationships. Hard work, continuous learning, and healthy networks often open doors to employment, business opportunities, mentorship, and partnerships. Learn practical skills. Alongside formal education, develop vocational, technical, agricultural, digital, or entrepreneurial skills that can generate sustainable income. Manage money wisely. Save consistently, avoid unnecessary debt, budget carefully, and invest whenever possible. Small financial habits, practiced faithfully over time, can produce significant long-term results. Support one another as a family. Families that encourage, mentor, pray for, and work together are often better equipped to overcome difficult circumstances. Maintain hope and purpose. Progress may be slow, but persistence, wise choices, and determination can gradually transform a family's future. Make wise family decisions. Carefully consider major life decisions such as marriage, having children, borrowing money, or starting a business. Planning ahead can reduce financial pressure and create a stronger foundation for long-term progress. Teach the next generation. Parents should pass on values such as honesty, hard work, responsibility, financial discipline, and the importance of education so that children do not repeat the mistakes or limitations of previous generations. CONCLUSION. Breaking the cycle of poverty is neither quick nor easy. It requires personal responsibility, strong values, education, honest work, resilience, financial discipline, and the wise use of every available opportunity. At the same time, governments, communities, employers, schools, faith-based organizations, and development partners also have a responsibility to create environments where hardworking families have genuine opportunities to succeed. When determination is matched with opportunity, families that begin in extreme poverty can build a better future—not only for themselves, but also for future generations. REV. ELIJAH MUTUA KIRIMA Social Worker THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD

WARNING SIGNS OF AN UNHEALTHY PREACHER OR MINISTRY.

OBSERVABLE PATTERNS. One warning sign is a noticeable difference between what a preacher has chosen for himself or herself and what he or she encourages others to do. For example: He or she benefited from accredited higher education, yet discourages others from pursuing recognized theological education. He legally registered his own ministry, yet discourages legal registration of ministries serving under him or her. He or she receives financial support, yet discourages practical financial assistance to the poor. He or she has invested in permanent church facilities, yet discourages local congregations from establishing their own meeting places. He or she produces books for sale that become the primary teaching material throughout the movement, while no one else—regardless of talent, skill, achievement, or position—is encouraged or permitted to write. These are genuine tensions that deserve thoughtful and prayerful examination. Questions Worth Asking Does the preacher apply the same standards to himself or herself that he or she applies to others? If there is a difference, do the explanations, if any, make sense? Are biblical reasons given for these positions, and are those Scriptures interpreted responsibly and in context? Is there transparency in how money is collected, managed, and used? Are local believers free to ask questions, disagree respectfully, or leave without fear, intimidation, or punishment? Can local churches become financially and administratively independent? ( Coordinating only to ensure fellowship, compliance with standards, by-laws, and the Word of God? Are local leaders encouraged to grow and exercise responsibility, or are they intentionally kept dependent on the headquarters? The answers to these questions often reveal whether an organization is healthy or unhealthy. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS. Further questions that may deserve careful consideration include: Do the benefits consistently flow to the central leadership while limiting the growth, independence, or legal standing of everyone else? Is there a deliberate dependence created around one central leader? Is independent thinking, personal Bible study, or careful theological examination discouraged? Are the ministry's books or publications elevated above the obvious truths that can be discovered through the simple and faithful study of God's Word? Are financial resources excessively concentrated in one central location? Are local churches prevented from becoming self-governing? Does the preacher or ministry lack meaningful financial accountability? Does the preacher or ministry avoid legal recognition where it is reasonably possible, thereby exposing followers to unnecessary legal risks? Does the preacher or ministry treat disagreement as rebellion rather than as an opportunity for respectful biblical discussion? Some of these practices resemble warning signs that researchers, theologians, and church leaders often associate with unhealthy or potentially cult-like organizational structures. Whether a ministry actually constitutes a cult would depend on additional evidence regarding its doctrine, leadership, accountability, treatment of members, and the freedom members have to think, question, and leave without coercion.[(Growing up, the single most tester of churches in our time as whether they were right in doctrine was whether they believed Jesus was God. Yet, actually the test is if one believes Jesus is the Son and has come in flesh: [Matthew 16:13-18; 1 John 4:2, 1 Timothy 2:5; Acts 17:31; Acts 3:26; 1 Corinthians 15:24-28; 1 John 2:23; John 5:23].] Practices that appear to create significant advantages for the central ministry while placing restrictions on local believers deserve careful examination. Greater transparency regarding motives, governance, and finances is necessary to avoid the perception that the interests of the headquarters are being prioritized over those of local congregations. Likewise, if policies consistently discourage local independence while increasing dependence on the central leadership, they may foster an unhealthy level of organizational control rather than the mature development of believers and local churches. By Rev. Elijah Mutua Kirima. THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.

PRACTICAL BENEFITS OF UNDERSTANDING JESUS AS A MAN

Many Christians interpret the biblical passages concerning Jesus differently, leading them to conclude that Jesus is both fully God and fully man. Others find this formulation difficult to explain logically. For example, while a cloth may be 100% cotton or 100% nylon, it cannot be both at the same time, although both cotton and nylon are fully cloth. Cotton and nylon would be equal, independent of each other and each able of itself, to do what the other can do. This is not true about God and Jesus Christ. Holding the view that, according to careful biblical exegesis, [Matthew 16:13-18; 1 Timothy 2:5; Acts 17:31; Acts 3:26; 1 Corinthians 15:24-28] Jesus is not the Supreme God but the human Messiah, Prophet, Teacher, and God's appointed Representative—whose authority, greatness, and mission rest entirely upon God's appointment—has several practical benefits. 1. It Promotes Godly and Responsible Leadership This understanding inspires political leaders, community leaders, church leaders, and believers to pursue the kind of leadership that Jesus demonstrated and that His future reign will perfectly embody: humility, righteousness, justice, compassion, servant-heartedness, and complete obedience to God. It reminds us that God alone is the Supreme Authority. Every leader is therefore accountable to Him, should seek His guidance through His Spirit, and should recognize that leadership exists not for personal gain but for the good of others and the fulfillment of God's purposes. The highest calling of leadership is to seek the welfare of creation and humanity in accordance with God's will. 2. It Encourages Respect for Legitimate Human Leadership This understanding also encourages respect for human leaders when they exercise their responsibilities with justice, wisdom, and integrity. Throughout Scripture, God repeatedly appoints human beings to positions of authority to accomplish His purposes. Moses, Joshua, David, the prophets, the apostles, and ultimately Jesus Himself were all appointed by God for specific missions. Recognizing this biblical pattern encourages respect for lawful authority while reminding every leader that they remain accountable to God for how they exercise their stewardship. 3. It Encourages a Consistent Reading of Scripture and Rational Reflection This position seeks to harmonize the whole testimony of Scripture while remaining consistent with sound reasoning. The Bible repeatedly declares that God is not a man (Numbers 23:19; 1 Samuel 15:29; Hosea 11:9). It also consistently presents God as appointing human representatives to carry out His purposes on earth. This understanding therefore maintains a clear distinction between the Creator and His creation, just as human beings do not become angels by nature, nor angels become human beings by nature. It also fully recognizes the reality of Jesus' humanity. He was born, breastfed, grew from infancy to adulthood, increased in wisdom and stature, worked as a carpenter, became hungry and thirsty, grew tired, slept, prayed, suffered, was tempted, and experienced the ordinary realities of human life. His greatness was not found in self-exaltation but in perfect faithfulness, unwavering obedience, complete dependence upon God, and total commitment to the mission entrusted to Him. For believers, this understanding reinforces the truth that greatness in God's kingdom is achieved through faith, obedience, humility, perseverance, and submission to God's will—qualities that Jesus perfectly demonstrated throughout His earthly life. His example therefore becomes not only an object of admiration but also a practical pattern for every disciple to follow. ~ Rev. Elijah Mutua Kirima THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD. JULY 23, 2026.

THE BIBLICAL PURPOSE FOR HUMAN EXISTENCE.

Why are we here? What is the purpose of human existence? The Bible presents a vision far greater than merely surviving, accumulating wealth, or waiting to leave this world. Humanity was created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26–28) to represent Him by wisely managing His creation under His authority. From the very beginning, Adam was placed in the Garden of Eden "to work it and take care of it" (Genesis 2:15). Work, creativity, discovery, and responsible stewardship were part of God's original design long before sin entered the world. Genesis 1:28 ("Be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion...") Micah 6:8 ("to do justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God"). Our calling is not to create something from nothing—that belongs to God alone—but to develop the potential He has already placed within creation. Every worthwhile discovery, invention, solution, act of healing, work of justice, advancement in education, improvement in agriculture, scientific breakthrough, technological innovation, artistic achievement, and effort to strengthen families and communities can become an expression of faithful stewardship when carried out according to God's will. This calling includes seeking the highest possible human flourishing: promoting physical, emotional, social, and spiritual well-being; confronting humanity's greatest challenges; caring for the environment; and, should future generations one day explore and inhabit other worlds, extending the same godly stewardship wherever God permits humanity to go. The governing principle for all this responsibility is love. Jesus taught that the greatest commandments are to love God with all our heart and to love our neighbor as ourselves (Matthew 22:37–40). Knowledge without love becomes arrogance. Power without love becomes oppression. Leadership without love becomes tyranny. Love transforms authority into service and stewardship into blessing. Many people aspire to become managers of successful companies because such positions carry trust, responsibility, and influence. Yet God has entrusted humanity with an even greater privilege: to serve as faithful stewards of His creation and as participants in the work of His Kingdom. What greater honor could there be? The biblical purpose of human existence can therefore be summarized as follows: To know and love God, reflect His character, faithfully steward His creation, develop its potential through responsible work and creativity, seek the flourishing of humanity and the whole creation, and govern every thought, word, and action according to the law of love, thereby advancing God's Kingdom on earth. This understanding gives dignity and purpose to every honest vocation. Whether one is a farmer, teacher, parent, carpenter, nurse, scientist, engineer, entrepreneur, social worker, artist, national leader or any other Godly work, every person has the opportunity to participate in God's ongoing work of cultivating, healing, discovering, building, serving, and restoring. Human life is therefore neither purposeless nor merely an empty wait to escape from earth. It is a divine calling to faithfully manage God's creation until the day Christ returns to bring about its complete renewal, or until we finish our earthly journey. Our aim should be that, when our lives are over, we may rest with the confidence that, by God's grace, we faithfully did our part. "The earth is the LORD'S, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein." — Psalm 24:1 "Moreover it is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful." — 1 Corinthians 4:2 By: Rev. ELIJAH MUTUA KIRIMA THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD July 22, 2026