Thursday, 22 October 2026

THE COST OF A CLEAN RISE.

 THE COST OF A CLEAN RISE


Getting even a small foothold in most places nowadays, especially in Africa, is not easy, whether one chooses a clean or “dirty” path. This increases the likelihood of being pressured into unethical practices to access anything meaningful—a job, business, capital, promotion, assistance, education, election, success, or even a social group to belong to.


Sometimes, a person is expected to work on the farms of potential helpers, care for their children, fetch food for their animals, wash their cars, or perform other tasks unrelated to their work, vision, or dreams. Sometimes, they are told to sign documents, give money, or falsely testify against someone. Others are overloaded with work until compliance seems the only way out. There is nothing wrong with acts of kindness when they are voluntary and the person requesting them does not act with a humiliating, disrespectful, dehumanizing, or unjust attitude.


Sometimes, you meet someone who appears to be an answer to prayer, only to discover that they want to isolate you from everyone and everything else, under the guise that finding what you wanted means you should forget everything else. You work excessively hard while your mentor earns, yet you receive nothing unless you comply with their wishes, even when those wishes are unethical. You may be forced into an unwelcome romantic or sexual relationship, or told to leave. You may be required to attend expensive seminars, sometimes at odd hours, or lose your opportunity. You receive vague or contradictory feedback, especially when you have not complied with their unclear or questionable demands.


Sometimes, people are forced into isolation and have their critical thinking dismantled before being persuaded to commit acts of violence. For example, a politician or employer may tell you to mobilize against other tribes if you want jobs or promotions for yourself, your children, or your community. Sometimes, there is an outright demand to commit crimes or acts of terror, yet the person issuing these demands is still regarded as a wise mentor and protector.


An “Us versus Them” mentality develops, accompanied by the warning that if you do not join “US,” you can “count yourself out.” A person may eventually become completely alienated.


When newcomers enter unfamiliar spaces, or people pursue a particular victory or success, their natural desire for belonging and achievement can be weaponized against them.


1. Financial Exploitation: The Cost of Admission


Predatory environments present financial extraction not as exploitation, but as an investment in one's future or a test of commitment. This may happen when seeking a job, contesting for a political seat, or when regional leaders, elders, or communities are expected to demonstrate goodwill through financial contributions to secure consideration for their regions.


Newcomers are often expected to work gruelling hours for free or below-minimum wages, sometimes for extended periods, under the guise of “gaining experience.” Their basic needs are disregarded, and any failure to comply may be interpreted as a lack of interest or commitment. Even attachments and internships as good as they are may be a way that excludes the poor who cannot get free days not because they are busy elsewhere making a lot of money but must be busy elsewhere to earn a single meal. When it becomes a must to attach the internship letter, we need to ask if the poor will get the free time for such free services.


Manufactured Financial Dependency: Newcomers may be encouraged to incur debts, such as paying for expensive accommodation controlled by the organization, trapping them in the system. Leaving becomes financially devastating. They must either conform to what others are doing or risk exclusion.


2. Character Corruption: The Erosion of Ethics


To make newcomers or people in need “fit in,” a group may dismantle their existing moral framework and replace it with its own pragmatic or corrupt rules for survival.


Incremental Complicity (The Slippery Slope): Newcomers or people in need are rarely asked to do something deeply unethical on the first day. Instead, they may be asked to overlook a small lie, approve a minor discrepancy, or participate in mocking an outsider. Once they comply, they become implicated, making it harder to resist greater violations later.


Normalized Deviance: The group presents unethical behaviour as “industry standards,” “street smarts,” or “what it takes to win.” Anyone who objects is shamed as naive, weak, or unsuited to the “real world.”


Compromising the Newcomer: Predators may deliberately create situations in which newcomers or people in need break rules or commit minor offences. Once their “hands are dirty,” this becomes leverage for silent or explicit blackmail, ensuring loyalty or providing justification for excluding them.


3. Exploitation of Personal Autonomy and Well-being


Beyond money and morals, newcomers and people in need may be systematically stripped of their personal boundaries.


Time and Energy Depletion: By overloading newcomers or making life extremely difficult for those seeking opportunities, predatory environments impose exhausting schedules and endless hustles to make ends meet. Chronic fatigue follows. A tired mind has less cognitive energy to critically examine exploitation or confidently say “no.”


Isolation from Support Systems: Newcomers or people in need may be told that outsiders, including family and old friends, are a waste of time, and that only lazy or visionless people keep seeking connections elsewhere. This cuts off external perspectives and reality checks. Even when the system promises resources, the individual may instead be victimized, labelled, and blamed.


CONCLUSION


A clean rise may be difficult to achieve today, yet there is an increasing need for more people who desire to rise with integrity, as well as people and societies that value and support a clean rise.


ELIJAH MUTUA KIRIMA

PASTOR AND SOCIAL WORKER

THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD.


Thursday, 15 October 2026

THE TWO VICTORIES: CONQUERING OTHERS OR TRANSFORMING LIVES?

 

THE TWO VICTORIES: CONQUERING OTHERS OR TRANSFORMING LIVES?

A warrior may use physical violence, or may simply exercise power without regard for dialogue, consensus, or the feelings and aspirations of others. Such a person insists that their word must be final and that anyone who dares to disagree must be defeated, humiliated, or silenced.

Eventually, this warrior may stand on the podium of victory, celebrating a seemingly great achievement. Yet, looking back at the battlefield, they may see the lives lost, hearts broken, dreams destroyed, careers derailed, and divisions created. The wounds may persist long after the battle is over, affecting individuals, families, communities, and even generations to come.

Outwardly, the victory may appear glorious, but inwardly, the victor may struggle with guilt, regret, broken relationships, and a painful sense of emptiness. For what is the true value of winning a battle if, in the process, we destroy the very people and relationships that give victory its meaning?

On the other hand, there is a different kind of warrior: the transformational leader who chooses dialogue over violence, consensus over dictatorship, and reconciliation over humiliation. Such a leader understands that disagreement is not necessarily disloyalty, that listening is not weakness, and that another person's different opinion does not diminish their own authority.

This path is not always easy. Those who choose peace may be mistaken for cowards, and those who seek consensus may face even greater aggression from people determined to impose their will. Nevertheless, the transformational leader perseveres, seeking solutions that protect human dignity while advancing the common good.

When this leader finally stands on the podium of victory, the view behind them is different. Instead of counting the fallen, they can celebrate violence prevented, lives and property protected, relationships preserved, and dreams and aspirations given room to flourish. Former opponents may become partners, broken trust may be restored, and the future may hold greater promise for all concerned.

The first victory conquers people; the second transforms situations and builds people. The first may establish dominance, but the second builds a legacy.

True leadership is not measured merely by how many people obey us, how decisively we silence opposition, or how high we rise above others. It is measured by how we exercise power, how we treat those who disagree with us, and what remains of people's lives, dignity, relationships, and hopes after we have achieved our goals.

Whether in families, churches, workplaces, communities, or nations, let us aspire to a victory that does not require the destruction of others. Let us become leaders who have the courage to listen, the wisdom to seek consensus, and the strength to choose peace even when violence or domination appears to offer a quicker path.

The greatest victory is not standing alone at the top after defeating everyone else. It is standing together at the end of the struggle, with lives preserved, dignity upheld, relationships strengthened, and a brighter future secured for generations to come.

Elijah Mutua Kirima
Pastor
THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD

Tuesday, 13 October 2026

UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTER OF GOD CAN IMPROVE LEADERSHIP AND SOCIETAL DEVELOPMENT.

 

UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTER OF GOD CAN IMPROVE LEADERSHIP AND SOCIETAL DEVELOPMENT

Many believers grow up hearing that God is all-powerful and does whatever He wants, whenever He wants, including causing suffering, oppression, and what would be considered injustice by human standards.

This presentation of God has helped create the perception that kings and rulers, too, have the authority to do whatever they want without being questioned by their subjects. Such a portrayal of God has served the interests of some political and religious leaders by encouraging the masses to believe that leaders, as representatives or appointees of God, know best, act according to His direction, and should not be questioned.

It therefore follows that a better understanding of God's character and nature can improve leadership and development in societies and nations around the world.

ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVES: A GOD WHO UPHOLDS JUSTICE

Not all believers or theological traditions agree with the idea of an arbitrary or morally unchecked God. Many theological perspectives challenge the notion that God does whatever He wants, including causing suffering, oppression, and injustice.

Careful theological reflection reveals that God's omnipotence (all-powerfulness) is consistent with His omniscience (all-knowing nature) and omnibenevolence (perfect goodness). From this perspective, God cannot act contrary to His righteous nature, because injustice would contradict His character.

Throughout the Bible, people questioned events and circumstances, including those in which they believed God was involved. Such questioning was not necessarily a lack of faith, but an honest engagement with a God whose character is associated with justice. If people could question God, human institutions and leaders should certainly uphold justice, avoid oppression, and remain open to questioning and scrutiny.

While some believers find comfort in the idea of an unquestionable, all-powerful ruler whose plans transcend human morality, political leaders have sometimes exploited similar thinking to justify doing whatever they consider to be in the public interest. Understanding that God's character is inseparable from justice, mercy, and love can encourage leaders to do what is right and citizens to hold them accountable when they do wrong.

Many contemporary believers increasingly emphasize a God of perfect justice, mercy, and love rather than portraying God as the author of arbitrary suffering. This understanding can inspire people to demand the same values from their social institutions and national leaders.

While God calls us to pray for leaders:

1 Timothy 2:1–2

“I urge, then, first of all, that petitions, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for all people— for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness.”

He also desires that people be transformed inwardly, willingly choosing truth and righteousness. A society in which people do what is right out of conviction, rather than fear or coercion, is better positioned to achieve lasting peace and development.

1 Timothy 2:3–4

“This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.”

When leaders fail to uphold justice, however, citizens must understand that they have a responsibility to speak for the oppressed and question those in authority.

Proverbs 31:8–9

“Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.”

If Abraham had the courage to question God:

Genesis 18:23

“Then Abraham approached him and said: ‘Will you sweep away the righteous with the wicked?’”

Then we, too, should have the courage to question our leaders when justice is at stake, and our leaders should be humble enough to listen, respond, correct their mistakes, and do what is right.

ELIJAH MUTUA KIRIMA
Pastor
THE WORD OF GOD IS THE WILL OF GOD